Our client [client account] runs the same Search campaign on Google and Microsoft. Bring the Microsoft side up to the Google standard.
Step 1. Read the sitelinks and callouts linked to Google campaign [Google campaign name]. Then read the extensions already attached to Microsoft campaign [Microsoft campaign name].
Step 2. Build a diff table with these columns: type | text | descriptions | URL | on Google | on Microsoft | action (add / skip / review).
Rules:
- Treat a Microsoft extension as a match if its text or URL is the same or nearly the same. Never add a duplicate, because duplicates are a common cause of disapprovals.
- If a Google sitelink points to a page that does not fit this Microsoft campaign's targeting, mark it "review" instead of "add".
- Microsoft tooling here supports sitelinks and callouts only. List the Google structured snippets separately as a manual task.
Step 3. Show exactly what will be added to the Microsoft campaign as a preview. Wait for my approval before adding anything.
Reads every enabled RSA in a campaign, matches each final URL to its WordPress page (Elementor included) and rates whether the page repeats the ad's keyword, offer and CTA. Proposes the smallest fix and applies nothing without approval.
When to use itWhen people click your ads but the WordPress landing page does not repeat what the ad promised, hurting conversions or Quality Score.
Lists disapproved and limited RSAs with Google's policy reason and evidence, rewrites only the assets Google flags, and edits the existing ad after a before and after preview. Flags issues that text changes cannot fix.
When to use itWhen some of your Google Ads are disapproved or running with limited serving and you need to fix the wording that Google flagged.
A list of fatigued Meta ads by frequency, CTR and cost thresholds, with two replacement copy versions for each and a safe in-place swap after approval.
When to use itWhen your Meta ads have been running a long time and results are slipping while frequency climbs.